See how a minor change to your commit message style can make a difference.
git commit -m"<type>(<optional scope>): <description>" \ -m"<optional body>" \ -m"<optional footer>"
Note
This cheatsheet is opinionated, however it does not violate the specification of conventional commits
Tip
Take a look at git-conventional-commits ; a CLI util to ensure these conventions, determine version and generate changelogs.
<type>(<optional scope>): <description> empty line as separator <optional body> empty line as separator <optional footer>
chore: init
Merge branch '<branch name>'
Follows default git merge message
Revert "<reverted commit subject line>"
Follows default git revert message
- Changes relevant to the API or UI:
featCommits that add, adjust or remove a new feature to the API or UIfixCommits that fix an API or UI bug of a precededfeatcommit
refactorCommits that rewrite or restructure code without altering API or UI behaviorperfCommits are special type ofrefactorcommits that specifically improve performance
styleCommits that address code style (e.g., white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons) and do not affect application behaviortestCommits that add missing tests or correct existing onesdocsCommits that exclusively affect documentationbuildCommits that affect build-related components such as build tools, dependencies, project version, CI/CD pipelines, ...opsCommits that affect operational components like infrastructure, deployment, backup, recovery procedures, ...choreCommits that represent tasks like initial commit, modifying.gitignore, ...
The scope provides additional contextual information.
- The scope is an optional part
- Allowed scopes vary and are typically defined by the specific project
- Do not use issue identifiers as scopes
- A commit that introduce breaking changes must be indicated by an
!before the:in the subject line e.g.feat(api)!: remove status endpoint - Breaking changes should be described in the commit footer section, if the commit description isn't sufficiently informative
The description contains a concise description of the change.
- The description is a mandatory part
- Use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes"
- Think of
This commit will...orThis commit should...
- Think of
- Do not capitalize the first letter
- Do not end the description with a period (
.) - I case of breaking changes also see breaking changes indicator
The body should include the motivation for the change and contrast this with previous behavior.
- The body is an optional part
- Use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes"
The footer should contain issue references and informations about Breaking Changes
- The footer is an optional part, except if the commit introduce breaking changes
- Optionally reference issue identifiers (e.g.,
Closes #123,Fixes JIRA-456) - Breaking Changes must start with the word
BREAKING CHANGE:- For a single line description just add a space after
BREAKING CHANGE: - For a multi line description add two new lines after
BREAKING CHANGE:
- For a single line description just add a space after
- If your next release contains commit with...
- Breaking Changes incremented the major version
- API relevant changes (
featorfix) incremented the minor version
- Else increment the patch version
-
feat: add email notifications on new direct messages -
feat(shopping cart): add the amazing button -
feat!: remove ticket list endpoint refers to JIRA-1337 BREAKING CHANGE: ticket endpoints no longer supports list all entities. -
fix(shopping-cart): prevent order an empty shopping cart -
fix(api): fix wrong calculation of request body checksum -
fix: add missing parameter to service call The error occurred due to <reasons>. -
perf: decrease memory footprint for determine unique visitors by using HyperLogLog -
build: update dependencies -
build(release): bump version to 1.0.0 -
refactor: implement fibonacci number calculation as recursion -
style: remove empty line
Click to expand
- Create a commit-msg hook using git-conventional-commits cli
- create following file in your repository folder
.git/hooks/pre-receive#!/usr/bin/env bash # Pre-receive hook that will block commits with messages that do not follow regex rule commit_msg_type_regex='feat|fix|refactor|style|test|docs|build' commit_msg_scope_regex='.{1,20}' commit_msg_description_regex='.{1,100}' commit_msg_regex="^(${commit_msg_type_regex})(\(${commit_msg_scope_regex}\))?: (${commit_msg_description_regex})\$" merge_msg_regex="^Merge branch '.+'\$" zero_commit="0000000000000000000000000000000000000000" # Do not traverse over commits that are already in the repository excludeExisting="--not --all" error="" while read oldrev newrev refname; do # branch or tag get deleted if [ "$newrev" = "$zero_commit" ]; then continue fi # Check for new branch or tag if [ "$oldrev" = "$zero_commit" ]; then rev_span=`git rev-list $newrev $excludeExisting` else rev_span=`git rev-list $oldrev..$newrev $excludeExisting` fi for commit in $rev_span; do commit_msg_header=$(git show -s --format=%s $commit) if ! [[ "$commit_msg_header" =~ (${commit_msg_regex})|(${merge_msg_regex}) ]]; then echo "$commit" >&2 echo "ERROR: Invalid commit message format" >&2 echo "$commit_msg_header" >&2 error="true" fi done done if [ -n "$error" ]; then exit 1 fi
- ⚠ make
.git/hooks/pre-receiveexecutable (unix:chmod +x '.git/hooks/pre-receive')
- https://www.conventionalcommits.org/
- https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
- http://karma-runner.github.io/1.0/dev/git-commit-msg.html
I do use
choreandbuild. I would not like to seemiscas an option on a project I was on as it would rapidly become the default for anybody who does not want to bother with the process (I have done this). I've never used "ops" but if the project had an clear separation of build and ops then I could see its use but would need to be convinced it added value.I like the descriptions given here.
For example, provided that the commit does not change ANY product behaviour I use:
buildchore@pycaw:
choreseems to me to be communicating intent like "just cleaning up (but not refactoring) ... nothing to see here". But I agree thatchoreis vague enough to be abused. Hmmm ... you make me think I ought to stop using it :-).@GabenGar: I would not use
chorefor dependency updates as they can, even if not intended, change product behaviour. If updating for a security issue then it is a bug fix as I recon security is a feature, a fix # would allow the fix to be recorded for next release (SBOM). If updating to avoid a future build failure then usingbuildwould be more useful to reflect that intent.In any case conventional commits are only really interested in
feat,fix, andBREAKING CHANGE/!commits anyway. It allows for use of other types but IMO any addtional types must service a purpose and not just a nice to have. I like to force a type on every commit so thatfeatandfixcommits are not forgotten.I think a long list of predfined types is useful to help others define there process but not as a predefined list in the tool as many are not relevant to a particular team's way of working. A team may want to enforce types that are used via a configurable white list. Or .. if the types are hard coded allow for users to define a type black list so that enforcement of useful types is enforced. Hey, maybe allow for a custom error reponse to include the team's policy along with why the rejected type is not used.